I really hope BioWare can improve for the sequel. It's a shame, because there were some great moments in Inquisition (like the poker game scene) but when I look back on it I can only think about the poor quest design and bad combat. Sorcerers stood against these creatures, witchers were created to fight them. Dragon fire was the bane of cities, and dragon appetite was a constant threat to the first colonizers. Journal Entry Once dragons were commonplace and ruled the continent absolutely. I felt like I was just holding RT and occasionally pressing a button. Later on in Chapter 3, there will be a battle with the dragon. Maybe it's the way I specced, or the gear I had (fuck that crafting UI), but I found battles went on for too long. I also just never found the combat satisfying. They give you so many skills, but then limit the amount you can use at once.

For some reason, Inquisition got rid of this. While you could assign some to face buttons, you could also bring up a wheel to select others.

I played Origins on both 360 and PC one of the smart things about the console version is how it handles active skills. Witcher 3 Posters - Officially Licensed Prints Displate The Witcher 3.

Very easy to get a lot more units with a bit of modding. (Minor spoilers: so skip or wutever) Ahem. I actually think Inquisition's combat is step back from the others, at least in some areas. Originally posted by:Thats a low ingame limit. I tried going back to the game to play the trespasser DLC right before Andromeda came out, but ultimately I ended up uninstalling it because I disliked the combat so much. The Witcher 3 - Which is the Better Game - Comparing Gameplay, Main and Side Story Quest, Characters, Exploration and open world. It's not perfect, but I had a lot of fun with it.ĭragon Age's combat on the other hand. I never had a problem with the combat in The Witcher 3 - outside of the first boss in the Hearts of Stone DLC.

Dragon age origins vs witcher 3